where did capital letters come from? why did they develop? are they any more than a device of punctuation? if they are in anyway superfluous then that would save learning however many letters of the alphabet why would learning less be good? easier for english language teachers!
reason for preferring small letters to capital letters - they have more curves bold capital letters demand attention, indeed they are many conventions supporting this, not least the internet protocol of capital letters = shouting is there something inherent in straight lines over curved lines that makes them more striking/attention grabbing/aggressive
relationship between language and thought - we dont think in capital letters in sanskrit there is no punctuation at all (in the music of erik satie there are no bar lines - whats the link) sanskrit is held to be the transcroiption of an oral tradition - the language of thought what does the rigid use of capital letters say about the language of english in relation to its ability to represent thought?
hmmm...capital letters, like spaces, are the result of the technologising of the word. As written, where the receiver is not present, nor can their nature be known, language demands more elaboration, it must be less densely packed, less implicit. Hence capital letters to show names or starts, spaces to break up words (there are no spaces in spoken language; try listening to someone speaking a language you don't understand)
historically, capital letters are probably a result of a fushion of carved and inked written forms, the carved form becoming co-oped to serve a new purpose (ie clarity) as increased popularity and further technologising of written language made smaller the amount that writers could assume about their readers.
but this is a guess, it could certainly be looked up!
on all this a must read is Walter Ong 'Orality and Literacy'
Last Modified 2/21/05 6:01 AM
|